Audio
What are the primary advantages of using lease options for selling property, according to this source?
The primary advantages for the seller include reduced vacancies, minimized maintenance issues, above-market rental income, tax benefits through deferred option deposits, lower turnover rates, and full retail sales prices. Furthermore, tenant-optionees are more likely to make property improvements, potentially adding value and reducing the seller’s costs. This also creates a “people management” system with the tenant having more “skin in the game”.
How does the lease option structure described in this source avoid the problem of a tenant acquiring a vested right in the property, and what implications does that have?
This method avoids a tenant gaining a vested right by using a “contract for option” that is separate from the lease. The option to purchase the property is not granted until a series of payments, time, or other defined events have occurred. This ensures that the tenant only has a contractual right (to receive an option in the future), not a property right, until the option is actually delivered. This allows the landlord to treat the tenant as a regular renter and allows them to use standard eviction processes rather than having to foreclose on the property. This differs from standard lease options in which the tenant has a vested right to buy the property, and the landlord must go through foreclosure to regain possession, even if they haven’t paid the required payments.
What are the key benefits of a lease option for tenants, as presented in the source?
Tenants benefit from a clean and functional home, fixed monthly payments with modest increases, fixed credits that can be applied towards a down payment, and credit counseling. The program creates a “buy while renting” environment with a defined path to ownership including a set sales price for a set period of time. Additionally, initial payments and deposits are credited towards their future purchase, rather than being viewed as a wasted expense, and tenants have flexibility to add improvements to the property.
How does this type of lease option agreement affect property management for the landlord?
The source suggests that landlords can manage approximately 35% more option properties compared to traditional rentals with the same amount of effort. This is because option tenants are more motivated to maintain the property due to their investment and intention to purchase the home. Additionally, they are more likely to take responsibility for day-to-day repairs. The agreement structure is designed to reduce landlord burden, making it a more hands-off management approach compared to traditional renting.
What does the source say about how to find and screen potential tenant/optionees?
The source advises advertising in the “homes for rent” sections of newspapers, using “Rent-to-Own” in the ad, and specifying initial payments, monthly credits, and rent amount. It emphasizes targeting prospective tenants who want to buy the property but are not currently qualified. They recommend not renting to former homeowners or renters that do not desire to buy a home. The source also notes that a flier can be placed on the window of the property to attract qualified candidates and recommends using tenant applications, property inspections, and other specific forms to screen tenants.
According to the source, what specific financial incentives are included in the lease option contract?
The contract includes initial option deposits, monthly credits applied towards the purchase price, and credits for tenant-made improvements. However, these credits are non-refundable, except under specific conditions outlined in the default section of the contract. A key incentive is that the monthly payments are usually higher than market value, with the excess applied as a credit. This is combined with credits for down payments and upgrades which are incentivized.
How does the source advise landlords to handle tenant defaults, and what does it suggest regarding option deposits?
The source recommends handling tenant defaults using standard landlord-tenant procedures because the tenant does not have a vested right in the property. When a tenant defaults, the option deposit is treated as the last month’s rent and used to cover any damages or repairs. The source has found that enforcing the nonrefundable term has not been profitable and often advocates for refunding a portion to facilitate a peaceful move out. They have found it is better to “buy-out” the tenant rather than pursue a lengthy eviction. They have provided a form to provide details to tenants on the use of funds from the security deposit.
What does the source emphasize regarding the legal aspect of the lease option arrangement?
The source emphasizes the importance of maintaining a landlord-tenant relationship and not granting the tenant a vested property right through their contract for option. The source stresses strict adherence to state landlord-tenant laws. The source also outlines the importance of using state-specific statutes regarding landlord tenant laws, and provides a resource for where they can be found. It argues this is essential to avoid the need for foreclosure should the tenant default or choose not to purchase the property. It also recommends being clear on what actions will cause a forfeiture of the monthly credits which can be another point of legal contention between tenant and landlord.
